Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 vs 2 vs 2
01-21-2015, 07:52 PM
Post: #1
2 vs 2 vs 2
Many suggestions for new modes come around, and many threads contain many suggestions; so this has been suggested before probably: I'm sure I've posted about it myself.

Anyway, why not? There's already a 3v3 mode, so 6 eggs do fit in a map; and there's already a 1v1v1 mode, so 3 teams are already programmed in the game. So, since we already have support for 6 eggs and 3 teams in the same game, why not have a 2v2v2 mode?

Sounds like a good idea to me. Maybe some people will think it's not playable; but then again, it's pretty much just a combination of 3v3 and 1v1v1, so it's just as playable as those modes. I definitely wouldn't make a 2v2v2 tournament, but it could most certainly be a fun mode to try out.

What do you think?

Find all posts by this user
Warn the author for this post
01-21-2015, 08:40 PM
Post: #2
RE: 2 vs 2 vs 2
The team on the middle. Especially in a flat map would have a disadvantage.
Find all posts by this user
Warn the author for this post
01-21-2015, 08:46 PM (This post was last modified: 01-21-2015 08:46 PM by Inuyasha.)
Post: #3
RE: 2 vs 2 vs 2
(01-21-2015 08:40 PM)Gothic Demon Wrote:  The team on the middle. Especially in a flat map would have a disadvantage.

You don't need to put both eggs of the same team together, really. (Besides, isn't that the same disadvantage as the player in the middle in a 1v1v1?)

Find all posts by this user
Warn the author for this post
01-21-2015, 10:05 PM
Post: #4
RE: 2 vs 2 vs 2
(01-21-2015 08:46 PM)Inuyasha Wrote:  
(01-21-2015 08:40 PM)Gothic Demon Wrote:  The team on the middle. Especially in a flat map would have a disadvantage.

You don't need to put both eggs of the same team together, really. (Besides, isn't that the same disadvantage as the player in the middle in a 1v1v1?)

And most of the 1v1s I've played. The middle player is the one to be hit and killed first.
Find all posts by this user
Warn the author for this post
01-22-2015, 12:53 AM
Post: #5
RE: 2 vs 2 vs 2
If there would be a pattern of teams (red,blue,green ect.) across the map, then I think it would work just fine. I support this, sounds like a lot of fun. I mostly play team games, and this would be such a nice thing to have.

[Image: 2cq0inq.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Warn the author for this post
01-22-2015, 04:57 AM
Post: #6
RE: 2 vs 2 vs 2
yea you suggested this before and even if members of teams would be scattered like

red then green then blue

green then blue then red


red would have advantage cause they don't have player in the middle.
Find all posts by this user
Warn the author for this post
01-22-2015, 05:19 AM
Post: #7
RE: 2 vs 2 vs 2
It's nice idea

[Image: 1zg93z5.png]
Find all posts by this user
Warn the author for this post
01-22-2015, 05:20 AM (This post was last modified: 01-22-2015 05:22 AM by Meow-mix.)
Post: #8
RE: 2 vs 2 vs 2
This idea sounds great to me.

Even if the 3 that are on one side of the map were possibly on the same team, but they are assigned a player on the other team, so there is no "kill stealing" might be a good idea..

Just a thought.

[Image: tumblr_o39stsESVH1uwgbtpo1_540.png]
Find all posts by this user
Warn the author for this post
01-22-2015, 12:12 PM
Post: #9
RE: 2 vs 2 vs 2
I would be okay with it as long as the teams were not spawned together. If they were spread out (ie: one team not being both spawned in the middle) it might be fun to play.

[Image: MA97x2h.png]
YOU MUST CONSTRUCT ADDITIONAL PYLONS.
Find all posts by this user
Warn the author for this post
01-22-2015, 04:32 PM
Post: #10
RE: 2 vs 2 vs 2
I prefer the classic 2v2.
I think with three teams it would get quite complicated.

[Image: tumblr_md962k302i1rk2qtwo1_500.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Warn the author for this post
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)